in

The mistake being made by protesting farmers

Farmers protesting in Ambala. (Image source: The Tribune India)
Farmers protesting in Ambala. (Image source: The Tribune India)
(Caution: The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author’s own and do not reflect the opinions or views of The Rational Daily in any manner.)

I have been a staunch supporter of the present ongoing farmers agitation, calling it ( in my articles and interviews ) a historical event as it has broken the barriers of caste and religion which have been dividing us, and united the Indian people. Thus it has overcome our disunity, which was the main obstacle to our nation’s progress.

However, I must also point out a mistake that the farmers are making, and that is their strategy of blocking roads for ingress and egress to and from Delhi.

The farmers’ leaders must realise that this strategy will lose the farmers public sympathy, as it causes immense difficulties for people living in Delhi and others who have to commute to and from it. Delhi residents are dependent on food grains, vegetables, milk, fuel etc which all come from outside, as nothing is produced within Delhi. If the roadblocks continue much further it will cause immense sufferings to the 20 million people living in Delhi, and others who have to use these roads for their daily work. The farmers are presently getting wide support from non farmers, but they will lose it by this strategy of blocking roads.

What should the farmers have done, since there is a deadlock between them and the government ? In my opinion they should accept the wise suggestion of the Supreme Court that the government should withhold implementation of the 3 laws to which the farmers are objecting, and the farmers should suspend ( not cancel ) their agitation. The farmers may continue their assembly near Delhi, but not block roads. Having accepted the suggestion of the Supreme Court, they should demand setting up of a Farmers Commission, consisting of representatives of the farmers organisations, govt representatives, and agricultural experts, to consider all aspects of the farmers problems, and the consensus which emerges from proceedings of this Commission ( which may require several sittings extending over several months ), to which all sides agree, can then be enacted as a law.

If the farmers accept the Supreme Court’s suggestion they will have thrown the govt on the backfoot, as then the govt will be blamed if it does not accept the Court’s suggestion and withhold implementation of the 3 laws ( which it can do by issuing an Ordinance ). The farmers leaders are thus missing a golden opportunity.

In a recent webinar held by an international organisation called Ibaadatkhana, in which Rakesh Tikait, one of the leaders of the farmers agitation and I ( amongst others ) participated, I mentioned this suggestion to Mr Tikait, and he said he will convey it to the Coordination Committee consisting of the 40 farmers agitations who are leading the farmers agitation. It is hoped that the farmers accept this proposal and correct their mistake.

Markandey Katju

Written by Markandey Katju

Justice Markandey Katju is the former Chairman, Press Council of India. Prior to his appointment as Chairman, Press Council of India, he served as a Permanent judge at the Supreme Court of India.

One Comment

Leave a Reply
  1. Govt & public have no faith in this farmer’s protest against 3Agri laws. Since this movement is backed from Cong other parties in opposition as well other elements. In which departments farmers’ sons are not working? Quoting that army are farmer’s sons to gather sympathy from public govt etc is not fair in interest of any one rather it will aggravate problems.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

India amid pandemic (Image source: Nikkei Asia)

Amid the year of pandemic and pain, the hope is still alive

Featured Image

A ‘warning’ to our policemen