in ,

Beating Censorship: The technique of literary guerilla warfare

Featured Image
Featured Image
In his YouTube interview, ‘There is so much censorship’, the well known Pakistani journalist and fashion designer Mohsin Sayeed has lamented that today censorship in Pakistan is worse than in Gen Musharraf’s time.
I have personal experience with this. Hardly any Indian newspaper publishes my articles, and no Pakistani newspaper does ( earlier they used to ). Probably they have been told by high ups in both countries to avoid me like the plague ( since I am very critical of the BJP in India, and have called Pakistan a fake, artificial country ). My views are published only in some brave portals like nayadaur.tv in Pakistan, and thewire.in, theweek.in and punjabtoday.in in India ( as well as indiacanews.com in America ).
However, there are ways to beat the censorship, as was done in the past, and I will mention about these here so that writers in both India and Pakistan may learn.
The way to beat it is by writing not directly ( for that will invite the censor ) but indirectly, by allegories, hints, allusions and suggestions, in other words by a kind of literary guerilla warfare ( in guerilla warfare one avoids a direct confrontation with a superior and more powerful enemy, but uses hit and run tactics ). Here are some ways in which it has been done in the past where there was no freedom of speech and expression :
(1) Much of Urdu poetry is a protest against despotism and injustice, but this is often expressed not directly but indirectly.
For instance take Faiz’ well-known sher ‘Gulon mein rang bhare baad-e-naubahaar chale, chale bhi ao ki gulshan ka kaarobaar chale’.
Now literally and ostensibly this means, ‘Among the flowers the colorful breeze of the new spring is blowing. Come, so that the work of the garden can be done’.
But this is not what the poet is really trying to convey. As explained in my article ‘Urdu Poetry’ on my blog Satyam Bruyat, Urdu poetry often has an outer, literal, superficial meaning, and an inner, deeper, real meaning. In the above sher of Faiz, what he means by the word ‘Gulshan’ is not a garden but the country.
The deeper, inner, real meaning of Faiz’ sher is this :
“ The objective conditions are ripe ( for a revolution )
  Come forward patriots, the country needs you “.




Obviously at the time when Faiz wrote this poem ( during the martial law regime of Gen Ayub Khan, when Faiz was in jail as an accused in the Rawalpindi conspiracy case, and could have been given a death sentence ), he could not write of Revolution directly, so see how beautifully, skillfully and ingeniously, he conveys his message.
His poem ‘Hum Dekhenge’ uses traditional Islamic imagery ( e.g. ‘ sab but uthwaaye jaayenge ) but obviously this is a subterfuge to protect himself. Faiz was a life long atheist, so obviously he is not wanting society to revert to Islamic fundamentalism, which Gen Zia was trying to do, rather it is a powerful attack on Zia’s oppressive regime.
(2) The Book of Revelations is found at the end of the New Testament in the Bible, but it is really the earliest Christian text, written probably in the 1st century A.D, when Christianity was a persecuted religion. It was dangerous then to propagate Christianity directly, so the author writes allegorically and figuratively as if relating a dream
(3) To avoid persecution, great writers have often written fiction e.g. Jonathan Swift’s ‘Gulliver’s Travels’ or Lewis Carrol’s ‘Alice in Wonderland’ which are powerful satires on British society and the rulers. Similarly, Russian writers throughout the Czarist era when there was strict censorship wrote fiction to attack despotism and the evils in society e.g. Pushkin’s ‘Boris Godunov’ and ‘Eugene Onegin’, Gogol’s ‘Dead Souls’,  Chernyashevsky’s ‘What is to be done’, and Gorki’s ‘Mother’. Milton’s ‘Paradise Lost’ is often regarded more as a political rather than  religious poem.
(4) Pamphlets or leaflets, published in some secret printing press, have often been used to attack autocracy e.g. the letters of Junius  ( whose real name no one knows even now ) attacking the despotic King George III.  Before the great French Revolution of 1789 many such pamphlets and leaflets attacking the feudal system in France ( including some anonymous ones by great writers like Voltaire and Rousseau ) were secretly published and circulated.
So people like Mohsin Sayeed should not be despondent or disheartened. They must learn the technique of literary guerilla warfare, and draw lessons and inspiration from the past.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect the views or opinions of TheRationalDaily in any manner.

TheRationalDaily is now on Telegram. For the stories that matter to you in everyday life, subscribe to TheRationalDaily on Telegram.


Since you are here… We would like to inform you that we are independent enough to reach you with the truth and the stories that matter to you the most. Support us for the journalism of revolution to keep the media independent. Support Independent Journalism   with any amount you wish to contribute.

Markandey Katju

Written by Markandey Katju

Justice Markandey Katju is the former Chairman, Press Council of India. Prior to his appointment as Chairman, Press Council of India, he served as a Permanent judge at the Supreme Court of India.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Viral CCTV footage shows police inside JMI University’s library

‘Spineless Govt and Spineless Court’